Is Sovereign Debt the New Subprime?
That’s a question many on Wall Street are asking as 2009 comes to a close. Just
as many subprime borrowers were unable to make their mortgage payments in 2007
and 2008, investors now fear certain nations will be unable to pay their debts
in the year ahead.
Rising mortgage defaults and credit card delinquencies put many banks on the
brink of bankruptcy in 2008, sending the global economy into a tailspin. But
sovereign debt defaults are potentially even more catastrophic as they can lead
to geopolitical instability, societal unrest and even war. And there will also
be economic ramifications for investors worldwide, putting America’s (and the
globe’s) fragile recovery at great risk.
To varying degrees, Greece, Spain, Ukraine, Austria, Latvia, Mexico are just a
handful of the nations viewed at risk of defaulting. Meanwhile, Dubai only just
avoided a similar fate thanks to a $10 billion bailout from their oil-rich
neighbor Abu Dhabi.
So, who else out there could rattle our constantly more interconnected world?
Here's a look at where the trouble spots could be:
Greece: Fitch Ratings last week joined two other ratings agencies in
expressing concern about the country’s health. “Greece faces the risk of sinking
under its debt,” Prime Minister George Papandreou said Monday in a speech where
he pledged to slash the nation’s budget deficit by overhauling the nation’s tax
system and cutting government spending.
Ecuador, which defaulted in December 2008
when President Rafael Correa said the nation wouldn't make an interest payment
of more than $30 million on a $510 million bond issue, carries a CCC+ rating at
S&P. They define the debt issuers in the CCC category as "currently vulnerable
and dependent on favorable business, financial and economic conditions to meet
financial commitments." Translation: Probably in for hard times.
Argentina, Grenada, Lebanon, Pakistan and Bolivia are judged to be a
little better off, but they're saddled with still dubious B- ratings. The
single-B classification at S&P means these nations are "more vulnerable to
adverse business, financial and economic conditions but currently [have] the
capacity to meet financial commitments." Translation: Not good, and needs some
things to go right, preferably soon.
Mexico: This week, S&P cut some of its ratings on America’s southern
neighbor, but said the outlook is stable. Why the move? Because the agency
believes Mexico's attempts to raise money through sources other than oil revenue
and to make the economy more efficient "will likely be insufficient to
compensate for the weakening of its fiscal profile." Put it on your watch list.
Spain: Before you go thinking that problems can only emerge from closed regimes
or places economists have stuck with the "developing" tag, think again. Earlier
this month, Spain's outlook was dropped to negative from stable by S&P, owing to
fears the nation "will experience a more pronounced and persistent deterioration
in its public finances and a more prolonged period of economic weakness versus
its peers."
What Is Sovereign Debt?
Now that we’ve (hopefully) got your attention, here are some definitions for
those unfamiliar with the subject:
“Sovereign debt” refers to the debt of nations. Just as the U.S. issues
Treasuries backed by the “full faith and credit” of the government, other
nations sell bonds in order to raise money to pay for programs ranging from
armies to public healthcare.
A “default” refers to a nation’s inability (or refusal) to repay its debt.
Whether a homeowner sends “jingle mail” (home keys via post) because a lost job
makes mortgage payments impossible or because a drop in home values makes paying
the mortgage uneconomical, the effect on the bank is the same: they lent money
and now they’re not getting it back.
The same goes for investors who’ve purchased sovereign debts. This is critical
because nations’ debt is often viewed as safer than corporate debt since
countries have the ability to raise taxes and increase tariffs in order to raise
money to pay their debts.
But “safer” is not the same as “safe” and certainly not guaranteed. There are
risks in owning nations’ or sovereign debt, as with any stock. Defaults by
Argentina in 2002 and Russia in 1998 are just recent examples in the long
history of sovereign debt defaults going back to the Spanish empire in the
1600s.
In a new book “This Time Is Different”, economic professors Ken Rogoff of
Harvard and Carmen Reinhart of Maryland, detail the history of sovereign debt
defaults, noting common traits, including:
High Debt-to-GNP Ratio
Since 1970, nearly half of sovereign defaults have occurred in nations
debt-to-GNP (gross national product) ratios of 60% or more. This makes sense: As
a country’s debts start to approach the size of its total economy (or GNP), it
gets harder to make the payments, just like a individual whose debts start to
eat up all (or most) of their salary.
Countries like the U.S. and U.K. have triple-A ratings, meaning they are
considered the strongest in terms of the ability to repay their debt. (The
ratings from top to bottom are based on the alphabet, AAA being the best to CCC
meaning the financial world doubts your ability to pay the money back.) However,
some experts worry about those pristine ratings being in jeopardy as Anglo-Saxon
nations continue to accumulate massive amounts of debt to pay for spending, and
to take on the recession.
A World of Risk
Few investors seriously worry about an imminent default by the U.S. or the U.K.
But with worries about Dubai's ability to pay its debts shaking markets across
the globe in recent weeks, investors are on guard about which other countries
might be in dire financial straights.
Ratings agency Moody's, for example, said Tuesday that the upcoming year could
be a rough one for government debt, issuing a report depressingly titled "Fasten
Your Seat Belts: Tumultuous Times Ahead."
Anyone with access to the business pages knows individuals, banks, companies and
governments everywhere have a serious problem -- just how bad it is and how long
it will last is still being sorted out. Unfortunately, we probably still have a
way to go before brighter days return.
What does this mean for the Christian and does it
have any biblical significance? The End Times will usher in a global financial
meltdown. A world leader will arise and have all of the answers needed to fix
the problems...stay tuned..
|